Date: February 26, 2013
Author: Mike Clayton

Clayton: Tour opposition to anchor ban ‘chaotic’

Tim Finchem, the Commissioner of the American PGA Tour, announced this morning that his organisation would not be supporting the ban, jointly proposed by the USGA and the R&A, on the anchoring of putters. Presumably he assumes the rest of the world s professional tour will fall in behind America. If they do not we then face the prospect, for example, of Adam Scott not playing here in Australia because whilst his putter would be legal in America he would be forced to adopt a short replacement for the Australian Open and Masters. Chaotic is word that comes to mind but Finchem has long displayed indifference to the professional game outside of his own shores. It is not his job, however, to care and we should understand that. Longer than standard putters first infested the game in the 1980s when yippers including Peter Senior, Sam Torrance and 1969 U.S Open champion Orville Moody found the extra long putters, when employed with the hands far apart, quieted their shaking hands. Their use spread slowly but steadily. Purists were horrified at the look of a putter with the handle end jammed under the users chin but few, including Scott, gravitated to the most extreme exaggeration of the long putter. No one won anything major with the longest putters. Scott come the closest with second place finishes at Augusta and Lytham but it was the shorter belly putter that precipitated the proposed ban. No longer could the administrators charged with controlling the rules look on without taking a stand. Here was a mid-length putter, jammed into the belly, being used, not to control the yips, but to simply putt better. One less variable is taken away from the stroke. The end of the club does not move or wobble and it is easier to move the putter on the perfect arc. From having nobody win a major championship with one, we saw Keagan Bradley win the 2011 PGA, followed by Webb Simpson winning last years U.S Open and Ernie Els taking advantage of Scott s brutal stumble over Lytham s closing holes in The Open Championship. Those three wins bought the debate to a head and crushed the previous argument that: no one has won anything significant with them so why bother? Worse, we saw a fourteen-year-old Chinese boy, Guan Tianlang, use the belly putter and win the Asian qualifying tournament thus earning his place at Augusta. It is hardly a long bow to draw to suggest that, in China at least, the belly putter will become the weapon of choice for his generation and those who follow. This is not the most critical issue facing the game. The extraordinary distances modern players are able to achieve with the combination of driver and ball have rendered almost all of the great courses of the world obsolete if the architectural intent of their designers is the measure. The problem with the ball and driver is that privately the vast majority of administrators will admit they should have done something long ago to limit and control the arms race lead by manufacturers bent only on profit, share holder return. Those money-oriented goals are reached by selling the promise of more length. It is not the manufacturers job to protect great courses or, indeed care about the welfare of history of the game. Nor is it their place to threaten with the law courts those charged with protecting history, tradition, the skills required to play the game and the architecture of the games greatest treasures the courses. I digress. It is not too late to ban the oversized putter. The traditional 35-inch putter still dominates the Tour and the game despite Finchem s ludicrous claim that 20% of golfers use an oversize putter. Surely that was a mistake. But if in 20 years the Guan Tianlang generation discover the belly putter is indeed easier to use and they adopt is as this generation has adopted the metal wood and two-piece ball it will be too late to ban it. The administrators will be once again crying out privately that, we should have done something years ago. One hopes they stand up to Finchem and do not bow to the pressure of fifteen or twenty vocal and influential tour players. If you care about the short putter and think the traditional swing of the putter is important then you must defend the traditional tool. If you don t, then by all means come down on the side of Simpson, Bradley, Tim Clark and the Commissioner. But understand it is not too late. It will, however, be in ten, fifteen and twenty years. We have already made that mistake with the ball and for too long the traditional game has been the loser. It was the great novelist, Ernest Hemingway who presciently argued decades ago that: my attitude toward punctuation is that it ought to be as conventional as possible. The game of golf would lose a good deal if croquet mallets and billiard cues were allowed on the putting green. You ought to be able to show that you can do a good deal better that anyone else with the regular tools before you have a license to bring your own improvements. Too true. Mike Clayton re-designed The Lakes in 2008 and played the Australian and European Tours for almost 20 years from 1981. He has won several tournaments around the world and still plays many Senior Tour events. His views do not necessarily represent that of Golf Australia.